Topic 3 of 6

Topic 3: From The Strengths-Based Model to The Affirmative Model

Learning Outcomes

  • Understand what the strengths-based model is and its intended purpose
  • Recognise the limitations of the strengths-based model and its potential for exclusion
  • Explore how third-level institutions can address these limitations
  • Understand the affirmative model and why it offers a more inclusive approach

"I often feel alone because I feel different from others."

This kind of experience is common among neurodivergent students, even in environments that describe themselves as supportive and strengths-focused. The models used to understand neurodivergence can shape whether someone feels celebrated, pressured, or quietly excluded.

Before looking at formal definitions, this topic invites you to pause with that feeling of "being different" and to consider how well current approaches in higher education really respond to it. In the sections that follow, you will explore how the strengths-based model and the affirmative model each frame neurodivergence, belonging, and inclusion, and what that means for students who may not see themselves in the usual "superpowers" narrative.

The Strengths-Based Model

The strengths-based model focuses on identifying neurodivergent individuals' unique abilities and talents. While this approach has positive intentions towards neurodivergence, a neurotypical understanding of this space has led to perceptions of "superpowers" that are valued through a neurotypical lens.

The Problem

This perpetuates an ableist view of strengths and success, potentially leading to an exclusionary framework when applied to neurodivergent individuals. While designed to celebrate unique strengths, many neurodivergent people report feeling excluded from this narrative, as they do not possess these "superpowers."

Addressing the Strengths-Based Model in Third-Level Institutions

Addressing the strengths-based model in third-level institutions requires a more nuanced and inclusive approach that respects the diversity of neurodivergent experiences without imposing neurotypical ideals or unrealistic expectations. Institutions should consider the following steps:

Broadening Definitions of Strength

Third-level institutions should expand the concept of strength beyond neurotypical productivity and success metrics. This means recognising and valuing a wide range of traits, including resilience, unique perspectives, sensory awareness, and adaptability, even when they may not directly correlate with academic achievement.

Reducing Pressure for Superpowers

Institutions should avoid framing neurodivergent students as possessing "superpowers" or expecting them to demonstrate exceptional skills. Instead, focus on providing support that enables all neurodivergent students to achieve their personal and academic goals.

Equitable Support and Resources

Ensure equitable access to resources that support diverse needs. This includes tailored accommodations, flexible learning environments, mentorship programs, and peer support systems that cater to students with varying levels of need.

Promoting Self-Acceptance

Foster environments that build self-acceptance and resilience, encouraging students to embrace their identities without feeling pressured to excel in conventional ways. Celebrate neurodiversity holistically, not solely through neurotypically recognisable strengths.

The Affirmative Model

The affirmative model is an approach that focuses on diverse support, flexibility, and acceptance. Third-level institutions can create a more inclusive and affirming environment through this approach. The affirmative model benefits neurodivergent students by recognising their unique contributions without subjecting them to narrow definitions of strength or unachievable expectations.

Collaborators of this project recommended a shift from the strengths-based model to an affirmative model.

Why Affirmative over Strengths?

The affirmative model centres identity, acceptance, and structural change, while the strengths-based model focuses on individual abilities and potential within existing systems.

Strengths-Based Model

What it does well

  • Shifts focus from deficits to abilities
  • Highlights unique talents and skills
  • Promotes positive self-image

Where it falls short

  • Values strengths through neurotypical lens
  • Creates pressure to have "superpowers"
  • Excludes those without visible talents

Affirmative Model

What it does well

  • Values identity and acceptance holistically
  • Focuses on structural and systemic change
  • Includes all neurodivergent experiences

Considerations

  • Requires institutional commitment
  • May need cultural shift to implement
  • Less familiar to existing frameworks
In summary, while the strengths-based model aimed to provide a more positive framework for neurodiversity, it often reflected neurotypical values and imposed pressures that had the potential to lead to exclusion, stigmatisation, and self-doubt within the neurodivergent community. An inclusive approach—the affirmative model—recognises and accommodates the full range of neurodivergent experiences, valuing each individual beyond their capacity to conform to neurotypical or “strengths-based” ideals.

Reflection Activity

Take a moment to reflect on what you've learned

Reflective Scenario: Strengths, Pressure, and Inclusion

Daniel, a university student who is autistic, has often been told he has "superpowers" because of his strong memory and pattern recognition. While he appreciates these skills, he struggles with sensory overload and executive functioning, making university life challenging.

In a seminar on neurodiversity, he hears the phrase "Not all neurodivergent people have to be exceptional to be valued." This makes him reflect—does he feel valued because of who he is, or only because of what he can do? If universities focus too much on strengths, what happens to neurodivergent students who don't fit the "gifted" narrative?

How might institutions move beyond the strengths-based model to create a more affirmative and inclusive environment?

Consider how the affirmative model might address Daniel's experience and support all neurodivergent students.

Your notes are not saved or graded. This is for personal reflection only.